Let’s get back to our core business – L.O.V.E.

bull's eye

When an organisation is struggling, advisors often encourage the leaders to refocus on the “core business“. Nobody benefits from spreading their resources too thin, from trying to achieve too many goals at once. Every company that wishes to be effective should take time out to consider what their most important product is; what they are uniquely positioned to offer to the market; what they do best.

Jesus makes it 100% clear what the “core business” of the church is – L.O.V.E. Before his death, he spelled it out plainly; “Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:34-35)

Alan Knox has just written an excellent series of blog posts about “the love problem“. He begins by saying; “Jesus said all people would know us by our love. But, when you ask people what they think about Christians, love is far, far down the list… if it even makes the list. We have a love problem.

In Alan’s latest post, “So, why does the church have a love problem?“, he goes on to point out that we should see God’s people demonstrating more and more love, the longer they go to church, if they are truly growing in spiritual maturity. Instead, we often find new converts are often more loving than those who have called themselves ‘Christians’ for many years. This may not always be the case, but it happens more than it should.

Alan puts his finger on one of the root causes of why the Christian church is not seen by the world as a beacon of love – the system we are using isn’t achieving our central goal of true maturity. He writes; “The “love problem” is a result of lack of maturity in Christ. I think this lack of maturity affects our love (and our demonstration of love) primarily because love cannot be taught through speeches, sermons, books, articles, seminars, conferences, and, yes, even blog posts.

If the “core business” of the church is love, we’re not going to get there through neatly packaged sermons, books and conferences (or blog posts, as Alan has remarked). We need to be engaged in deep relationships, in living life face-to-face and side-by-side. We need to be able to observe one another demonstrating love, to actively give and receive love, to talk less about love and experience love more. As we put love into practice, we work our spiritual “love muscles” and build up strength and endurance.

Do sermons help people love one another better? Is group singing an effective way to build deep relationships? It would be easy to think churches are all about education and inspiration, not the messy business of loving one another. Perhaps it’s time for church leaders to do an organisational review and check whether they are focusing on the “core business” of love.

 

Jesus the revolutionary

Revolution

Jesus led a revolution without guns and without placards. It wasn’t the revolution the Jews hoped for, the one where the Messiah would come in glory and grandeur, and frighten away the occupying forces, restoring Israel to a position of power and prestige. It wasn’t even the non-violent political resistance we associate with activism today.

Jesus turned the world upside down with the way he treated people.

He empowered the disempowered.

He loved the unlovable.

He honoured the dishonourable.

Jesus gave a voice to the voiceless. He placed value on women, children, servants, foreigners – those without status or value in the social order of the day. He chose the sick, the marginalised, the ostracised, and made them his ambassadors. He raised the social standing of the outcast and rejected. He was more likely to offend and irritate those in power than to suck up to them.

Jesus didn’t play the game by the usual rules.

Over and over again, Jesus’ teachings and actions were about reversing the established social order, changing the balance of where we place our regard and esteem. He told us the last would be first, and the first would be last. He used prostitutes, widows and outsiders as examples to shame the religious and self-righteous. He used the word “blessed” to describe the poor, the meek, the persecuted. In town after town, as he travelled, he encountered “the least of these” and empowered them, dignified them, publicly affirmed them – showing up the unloving, unjust imbalance of our social order. In the end, Jesus gave the most precious gift he had – his life – to redeem the worthlessness of our lives. He died as he lived – intentionally lifting up the lost, the weak and the needy.

Jesus displayed a revolutionary, upside down way of seeing the social order that simply doesn’t make sense to us. He turned the system on its head. We’ve done our best to turn it the right way up since then.

In our churches today, we choose the brightest, the best, the talented and persuasive, and place them on a stage.

We turn the lights up on the performers, and dim the lights over the audience.

We strive for excellence over authenticity and honesty.

We empower pastors and leaders, and unintentionally disempower everyone else.

We are widely known for publicly condemning the hurting, the lost and the marginalised, adding to their humiliation and shame by drawing attention to their ‘sins’.

It’s time for the church to rediscover Jesus’ obsession with “the least of these”. It’s time for us to intentionally empower those on the fringes, those who are undervalued, unloved and unheard. It’s time to publicly place value on the marginalised, the poor, the weak, the mentally ill and the disempowered.

It’s time to join the revolution.

 

Relational unity begins at home.

Alan Knox is my very favourite blogger. He challenges God’s people to rethink the assembling of the church, but he does it with graciousness, fastidious attention to detail and Scripture, and a generous spirit towards other bloggers and commenters following a similar journey. Alan regularly initiates a “chain blog”, where anyone who wants to can post their thoughts on a shared theme. This time, the theme is “real relational unity“.

Rocking chairs

If I skimmed through the “leadership” section of my local Christian bookstore, I would find lists of the kinds of characteristics people want to see in potential leaders – words like ‘vision’, ‘mission’, ‘competence’, ‘communication skills’, ‘determination’ and ‘can-do attitude’. However, when I look at Paul’s writings about the qualities of spiritual leaders, one of the stand-out features to look for is relational unity in the home. Paul strongly urges Timothy and Titus to look for strong marriages and families in potential leaders (1 Tim 3:2-12, Titus 1:5-9), saying “If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?

A harmonious home life is not something you usually see in a job description – in fact, you probably wouldn’t be legally allowed to include it these days! However, there’s a good reason Paul valued it so highly. Jesus left very few specific instructions for his church, but nearly all of them revolve around the theme of loving one another. The church is supposed to be characterised by real relational unity. This is how the world will know we are his followers – if we love one another. Love was Jesus’ core business. It was his service delivery model, his strategy for saving the world. He summed up God’s laws into two commandments – and both of them begin with “love”.

I’m a big believer in love. I long to pour my life out in serving others in love, as Jesus did. But, the older I get, the more I realise that I can only give out of my abundance. I can only be relationally generous when I am relationally secure. Luckily, God has blessed me with family relationships to fill my deep emotional needs, and give me the energy I need to spread God’s love to my church family, my neighbours, and the people who cross my path each day. I get amazing strength from my husband, who has loved and adored me for more than 20 years, and from my sister, who generously showers me with words of encouragement and support. Not everyone has the luxury of belonging to a believing family, and many need to seek spiritual mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children to connect with and find real relational unity with.

Ironically, the best relationships I have are also the hardest, and the most in need of constant work and nurturing. Those closest to me are most likely to trigger my sensitive fears and pain. My amazing husband and my four beautiful children are the ones most likely to encounter my wrath, my anger and my selfishness, especially when I am tired, needy or vulnerable. They are the ones I have wounded with my sharp tongue, my critical spirit. Just yesterday morning, I accidentally hurt my husband’s feelings with the way I spoke to him, and he unintentionally hurt me back. We needed to confess and forgive later that day. These are not relationships I can take for granted or ignore – I have to be purposeful and intentional to make them work well.

If you are in any kind of ministry, and don’t have relational unity at home, prioritise it; pray for it and work at it. It is your greatest resource. If you do have relational unity, don’t take it for granted. Keep working at it. The love you share together as a family will spill into your relationships outside of the home and create the real relational unity that the world longs for.

 

If you’d like to write a blog post on the theme of “real relational unity”, here are the rules…

Chain blog rules:

1) If you would like to write the next blog post (link) in this chain, leave a comment stating that you would like to do so. If someone else has already requested to write the next link, then please wait for that blog post and leave a comment there requesting to write the following link.

2) Feel free to leave comments here and discuss items in this blog post without taking part in the actual “chain.” Your comments and discussion are very important in this chain blog (both on this post and the other link posts in the chain).

3) When you write a link in this chain, please reply in the comments of the previous post to let everyone know that your link is ready. Also, please try to keep an updated list of links in the chain at the bottom of your post, and please include these rules at the bottom of your post.

—————————————————

“Links” in the “Real Relational Unity” chain blog:

  1. Chain Blog: Real Relational Unity” by Alan
  2. The Treasure of Unity ‘in’ our Relationships” by Jim
  3. So The World May Know – Observations on the Road to Unity” by Christopher
  4. Christian Unity – What it is and What it’s not” by Nathan
  5. Steps to Relational Unity” by Randi
  6. Learn to Live or Live to Learn” by Greg
  7. The Limits on Unity” by Arthur
  8. Joints of Supply” by David
  9. Some Examples of Real Relational Unity” by Alan
  10. An example of relational unity” by Greg
  11. “Relational unity begins at home” by Kathleen

Who will write the next link post in the chain?

 

Community is irresistible

Hands

We were designed for community. We thrive when we find it. We crave a sense of belonging; a deep connection with other humans. The world doesn’t have many options of functional community to meet our needs. Facebook is as good as it gets for many people.

God created church to be the most functional form of community ever seen. Church is supposed to be the place where we love God by loving one another. God designed the church to operate as a body, connected and working together, with each part having a special place. He invites us to live side by side as a family, meeting each other’s needs through the seasons of life. If we are going to tap into the full potential for the church to shine in the darkness of this disconnected, dysfunctional world, we need to start meeting face-to-face, engaging in a two-way conversation, growing in strong relationships with each other and accepting one another as Jesus accepted each of us.

We need to start connecting with one another.

3 lessons churches can learn from social media.

Social media

If Johannes Gutenburg could have forseen the impact of the printing press when he invented it in 1440, he would have been astounded. The ability to transmit large amounts of information widely and over great distances transformed society, culture, education and institutions. Many historians believe the printing press gave birth to the scientific revolution of the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution, and has resulted in modern culture and lifestyle we enjoy today.

When scientists began to develop the internet last century, they couldn’t have forseen the revolutionary impact on culture, commerce and communication that is taking place today. The ability to connect and to access information at a global level is changing the world we grew up in. Everything we thought we knew is changing. Business models are crumbling. The way we shop, read, learn and interact has completely shifted – and we’re not going back.

The printing press was the start of “mass media” – for the first time in living history, information could be passed on to a large portion of the population, rather than contained to a small sub-group of society. The internet has given birth to “social media” – for the first time in history, people are able to connect and participate in a two-way interaction, rather than passively receiving a one-way broadcast. Take a quick look at the big success stories of the internet – Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, to name a few. The brilliance and attraction of these sites is that they give ordinary people a voice. Anybody can be a somebody. Contribution and participation are encouraged and valued.

People aren’t satisfied anymore with organisations who continue to broadcast at them, without allowing them the opportunity to interact, connect and contribute. If churches want to move away from performing for a passive audience, they can learn a few key lessons from the successful social media giants.

Lesson 1: Let people talk.

People like the sound of their own voice. They pay more attention and learn more from a conversation they have been part of than a monologue they have listened to. Instead of a sermon, set up discussion groups or conversation pairs to explore God’s Word together. Use questions to get them thinking, rather than feeding them the answers. Create learning opportunities which allow them to reflect and grow. Empower God’s people to think for themselves.

Lesson 2: Listen when they talk.

Giving people a voice in church empowers them to use it outside of church. Affirm people when they contribute and speak up – they have something of value to share with God’s family. If you stop speaking and start listening, you allow room for the Holy Spirit to talk through others. Pay close attention to those who appear to be “the least of these” – many times, it is the youngest, or most broken members of the church who have the most profound insights to share.

 Lesson 3: Prioritise connection.

I’m not talking about that “one-way” connection, where the pastor smiles and shares personal stories and the audience members feel connected, even though he doesn’t know their names and probably can’t even see them through the bright stage lights. And I’m not talking about that “shallow” connection that occurs when morning tea is the only interaction time built into the regular meeting time – often in a different area from the sermon and worship and “spiritual stuff”. I’m talking about letting people really connect with each other – through shared experiences, shared stories and laughter. I’m talking about setting up our meeting times to build relationships with each other, not just stare at the back of each other’s heads.

Social media is not just a “fad”. It is a global shift in the way we communicate and interact. It is impacting businesses, governments and establishments worldwide, and it is already changing the way many people do church. It’s time to sit up and pay attention to the underlying message – people want to be heard, they want to contribute, and above all, they want to connect.

Malls, churches and marketing psychology.

Couple Carrying Shopping Bags in Mall

The older I get, the more suspicious I become of shopping malls. Do you know they’ve studied human psychology and designed the whole mall to increase your buying behavior? They know exactly what flooring to use, what height to raise the ceiling, what colour schemes work best, what music to play, how to dress shop windows and how to position shops to maximize your spending. All I know is that when I go to a bright, new, shiny mall, I experience a mix of two emotions; one which suddenly makes me realize how desperately I needed new clothes, shoes, trinkets and knick-knacks to make me happy; and one which can smell manipulation a mile away and screams at me to leave as quickly as possible, and protect my heart and my wallet. My usual strategy is to stick to my local shops, and avoid stepping into these malls in the first place.

I worry that many churches are reading from the same marketing manual as shopping mall designers. I am concerned they are using similar techniques to influence consumer behaviour. I visited a different church recently and saw all the familiar marketing tricks; a beautifully presented, inoffensive and neutral building; friendly, welcoming people placed at strategic locations, smiling and establishing eye-contact with me; an intense time of group singing which directly altered my emotional state and made me feel like a small part of something bigger; a dynamic speaker who started the sermon off with humor and stories to establish his credibility, then weaved in an emotional hook to complete the sale.

The whole experience made me feel like a target, like a “potential customer”. It felt smooth and slick, coached and orchestrated. Even though I’m a regular church attender and know how sincere people’s motives were, my natural skepticism kicked into gear and warned me to hold back from the obvious emotional manipulation. It left me feeling a bit unsettled.

I love what this church was trying to do – and so very many churches like it. I know that God’s people are earnestly trying to present a comfortable, emotionally engaging, high-quality presentation of God’s message to the world. Many of these churches don’t understand why the world is staying away from their “seeker-sensitive” services. The people around us are natives in a marketing world. They know what we’re trying to do – shift their belief systems, convert them to a different way of thinking. And many of them will take steps to guard themselves and their emotions by avoiding stepping into our buildings in the first place.

Church isn’t hitting the target.

Miss the target

Grace has been going to a new church for nearly three years now. It seems silly to call it her “new church” when she’s been going there for so long, but she still feels like a newcomer, like an outsider. If you knew Grace, you’d realize that’s quite strange, because she’s one of the most social, relational people you’ll ever meet. In any other social setting, she’s the life of the party, makes friends easily and builds relationships quickly. Grace loves the new church. The music is good, the teaching is great, and many of the people are exactly the sort she would like to connect with deeply and have strong relationships with. She has a small group of friends she already knows well from outside of church, and most weeks she ends up chatting to them over morning tea at the end of the service. But she’s frustrated that it is taking her so long to truly connect with the other people in the church, who could have such an impact in her life and be part of her journey growing in God. With two small kids and many other commitments in her busy life, she can’t make it to other church events such as small groups, lunches, camps and other meetings. She’d really like Sunday mornings to be more relational, to have the chance to go deep with people and get to know them better.

Grace wants to feel connected.

____________________________

 Josh struggles to concentrate through the Sunday morning service each week. He tries to listen, but he finds his mind wandering during the sermon. Like most people his age, he’s completely at ease behind a keyboard and an active user of social media, but he finds it hard to get anything out of a one-way lecture. He’s used to being a part of the conversation, not a passive listener. Outside of church, he usually gets to participate in the discussion and contribute his own opinions, even if it’s just by pressing “Like” on his Facebook page. At home, he gets to control what footage he wants to view, what music he wants to listen to, and what topics he wants to talk about. He is an active contributor to the online community, writing a regular blog and developing a strong following on Twitter. He doesn’t own a television set, and doesn’t need to, preferring to direct his own viewing and learning experience online and in collaboration with his social networks. In church, he finds that his voice isn’t welcome or invited, and that he is treated as a member of an audience, not as a person who may have something to contribute. He wants to be there, but he gets bored when he doesn’t get the opportunity to participate.

Josh wants to feel engaged.

____________________________

Michael is in his fifties, and became a Christian when he was 20. He’s been actively involved in church for well over 30 years, and has a deep love for God and his people. He is a highly intelligent man, a deep thinker, with lots of energy and lots to give. He recently approached his pastor to discuss his frustration with the church format. He said he didn’t feel comfortable anymore being told when to sit, when to stand, what to sing, what to think, and when to leave. He was told he needed to submit to God-given authority and change his attitude. He didn’t try to bring the topic up again.

Michael wants to be empowered.

____________________________

Grace, Josh and Michael are attending good churches. Great churches, even. Churches filled with wonderful people, solid teaching, uplifting worship services. The problem is, those churches are meeting the wrong needs. They are using a model which assumes God’s people need a weekly ritual of inspirational music and pep-talks. Until churches creatively rethink the format, they won’t be able to meet people’s deep needs for connection, engagement and empowerment.

This Easter, let’s set aside our divisions and practise true religion.

Washing feet

In my youth, it seemed as though entire church denominations were at war with one another. Evangelicals were certain Catholics had it completely wrong. High Anglicans looked down upon low expressions of church. Baptists thought Pentecostals were from another planet. God’s people focussed on their theological differences, rather than the core beliefs that drew them all to the same God. The world looked on in dismay, and quietly retracted any expectation of discovering God through this violent, divided “religion”.

Theology is a funny thing. Each one of us has our own theology, in the same way that we each have our own world view – influenced by our culture, traditions, education, personalities and life experiences. Not one of us can understand the fullness of God in this life – and even if we could, we’d never be able to adequately communicate it to others. It’s ok though – at its core, the “good news” is that God didn’t require us to meet Him on His terms, at His level of holiness and perfection, but that He met us where we were at, at the level we could handle. God is big enough to cope with our inadequate theologies.

Without doubt, the Pope is the most public human face of Christianity worldwide. This year, I am greatly encouraged by the words and actions of Pope Francis, who has, in a very short space of time, challenged both the establishment and the world’s view of the church. I am not a Catholic (although I love and appreciate my Catholic brothers and sisters), but I join Pope Francis in “longing for a poor church, and a church for the poor.”

Outsiders have a point when they blame wars and immoral power struggles on “religion”. However, the Bible writer James had something to say on this matter. He wrote; “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after widows and orphans in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world” (James 1:27). As Jesus-followers, we have a role to play in bringing justice to the oppressed, hope to the hopeless, love to the unloved, mercy to the fallen, and grace to the disempowered. This year, let us set aside our theological differences and practise true religion, side-by-side – we might find that God’s definition of “religion” is one that nobody can argue with.

Is the church guilty of miscommunication?

 miscommunication

We don’t always say what we think we’re saying.

Communication is a funny thing. It’s more than just the message itself. Have you ever said (or texted, or emailed) something you thought was quite clear, yet found out later the other person misunderstood you? Maybe you didn’t speak clearly. Maybe they weren’t listening. Maybe there was a double meaning. Maybe there was a cultural bias or a back story you weren’t aware of. Miscommunication happens all the time.

As a first year Speech Pathology student, I studied the three parts required in all communication – a sender, a receiver, and a message. However, the communication cycle really becomes effective when a fourth element is added – feedback.

Without feedback, miscommunication is inevitable. When people aren’t able to respond, or ask for clarification, they’re not likely to buy into your message – or even get it in the first place. If you’re not listening to them, why should they listen to you? No, seriously, why should they? If the communication is a one-way channel, the “listener” becomes a critic, cynically evaluating whether they should pay attention to you or not. As soon as the channel becomes two-way, it is a relationship – and the “listener” becomes an equal partner, not an undervalued commodity.

In the past, we were prepared to tolerate the constraints of the system. At University, I had to put up with sub-standard lecturers, employed for their research skills, not their teaching talents. Today, I can study whatever I want, at my own pace, in my own time, in my preferred medium, for my own purposes – thanks to the networked intelligence of the world, available at my fingertips. In the marketplace, I used to buy products based on advertising and clever marketing. Today, I go straight to product review sites to hear from real people how well the product works in real conditions, before making any significant purchase. In church, I used to take what inspiration I could from the worship time and the sermon, making the most of whatever message the paid professionals had prepared for the masses that week. Today, I prefer to meet with God’s people face-to-face, to share our stories and our lives, and explore God’s story directly together, teaching one another and ministering to each other.

Without feedback, churches aren’t saying what they think they’re saying. An expert on the stage providing a one-way monologue isn’t communicating to people that they matter, that their opinion is valued, that they have something to contribute. Dialogue is more powerful than monologue. It’s time to open up the channel of communication and give God’s people a voice.

From preaching to facilitating – same skill set, different mindset.

Change directions

Nearly all the pastors I have ever met are wonderful people. Gifted and intelligent communicators with strong people-skills; committed to living out God’s calling through all the ups and downs; dedicating their lives to understanding God’s message and sharing it with the world around them. Noble, exciting men and women with a sense of purpose and vision. I love them and am inspired by them.

And yet, I am increasingly convinced that the sit-sing-sermon model of church has had its day, and needs to give way to something new – something interactive, and engaging, and empowering, where God’s people are invited to contribute and participate. But where does this leave all the pastors, with their many years of training; with their finely honed preaching skills; with their ability and talents for performance?

The truth is, churches are going to need leadership as much as ever if they move from performance to empowerment – but the leadership will be less about performance and more about facilitation. Many pastors have the right temperament, wisdom, and communication skills to make excellent facilitators, but they have to turn their thinking upside down to get there.

Preaching involves talking – facilitation is about listening.

Preaching has all the right answers – facilitators ask the right questions.

Preachers take all the credit – facilitators give all the credit.

Preachers hold on to authority – facilitators hand over authority.

Preachers have a voice – facilitators give others a voice.

Excellent facilitators do less than 30% of the talking, and get others to do the 70%. They risk letting others interpret God’s Word and listen to God’s Spirit instead of doing it all themselves. They give others credit for their ideas and insights, without boasting of their own. They hand over most of the power, control and status, rather than holding onto it.

Not everyone can be a good facilitator. It takes skill and faith, confidence and humility, maturity and vulnerability. These are traits many pastors and “lay-people” already have. My husband and I are currently developing a course called “Foundations in Facilitation”, to help leaders “empower everyone through dialogue, discovery learning and direct access.” Our prayer is that pastors will stop performing for God’s people, and start empowering them. Less personal reward, greater kingdom impact.